[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving binary files to /RAM
- Subject: Re: Moving binary files to /RAM
- From: email@DELETE_THIS.luddite.no-ip.com (Simon Williams)
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 02:27:45 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Luddite Enterprises
- References: <1gr4l27.10w3ygd1bycnoyN%email@DELETE_THIS.luddite.no-ip.com> <10vngq9175mp5e5@corp.supernews.com> <1gr5fun.1pixfg1vgp896N%email@DELETE_THIS.luddite.no-ip.com> <10vo7oktk9co5c0@corp.supernews.com>
- User-agent: MacSOUP/2.4.6
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7628
On a tangent, but still related:
Just so you know why this matters, I'll explain what I'm up to: I'm
trying to put together another drum sequencing program using DAC522 a la
TIMELORD. I thought that by using /RAM to store the samples I could make
use of more/bigger samples thus extending the programs capabilities
however:
I have 16 samples named "A"..."P", each 3072 bytes copied to
/RAM/SAMPLES/
I'm using this code to play them in order:
160 FOR F = 65 TO 80
170 PRINT CHR$(4)"BLOAD /RAM/SAMPLES/" CHR$(F) ",A$2000"
180 CALL 35840 : REM DAC522
190 NEXT F
What happens, oddly enough, is that the first 12 samples play
back-to-back as one would hope, but then there is a noticeable delay
between the last four. I've tried this on a IIe, IIgs and IIc+ with the
same result...
Any ideas...?
--
._____.
|[LD8]! SIMON WILLIAMS :: LUDDITE ENTERPRISES UNLIMITED
| (O) | 68K MACINTOSH SERVER http://luddite.no-ip.com
!__!__! FAILURE RECORDS http://failurerecords.no-ip.com