[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speed of AE Z80plus ?
- Subject: Re: Speed of AE Z80plus ?
- From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Date: 01 Aug 2004 17:14:44 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
- References: <M17Pc.3032$%J6.2895@trndny07>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:2796
Moll wrote:
>Greg Buchner wrote:
>> In article <20040801025044.10926.00002773@mb-m02.aol.com>,
>> mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon) wrote:
>>
>>>(Unoptimized
>>>screen I/O that switched to the 6502 on each character compounded
>>>the sluggishness.)
>>
>> I always thought that was just something inherent in Z-80 computers. I
>> worked at a place for a while that used Dec Rainbow 100's
>> <http://www.cedmagic.com/history/dec-rainbow.html> and the screen when
>> running under the Z-80 mode was incredibly slow. It was like using the
>> VT-100 part of it at about ~4800bps. The company had these computers
>> and all they used was the Z-80 side of them, even though they had some
>> MS-DOS software sitting around that was loads faster. That would do
>> near instantaneous screen updates.
>>
>> Greg B.
>
>You know, that makes me wonder if a nearly all-native CP/M 2.2 BIOS
>could be written, that only uses the 6502 for drive access.
It certainly could, for the cards that have direct access to Apple video
memory.
Of course, that might be a bit at cross purposes, since the really fast
CP/M cards for the Apple II did not have direct memory access, instead
passing all data a byte at a time through I/O ports.
-michael
Check out parallel computing for 8-bit Apples on my
Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/