[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CUSTOM ENHANCED IIC ROM CHIP: $8 plus shipping
- To: Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.dotnet>
- Subject: CUSTOM ENHANCED IIC ROM CHIP: $8 plus shipping
- From: Stephen E Buggie <buggie@unm.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:13:19 -0600
- In-reply-to: <A6ODc.20930$E84.12558@edtnps89>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- References: <ev0ud01s2quk9015r4lcsemv8f0vh9n7ov@4ax.com> <EfGDc.20622$E84.15504@edtnps89> <40df59b2$1@news.uow.edu.au> <A6ODc.20930$E84.12558@edtnps89>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:2157
I can burn the IIC enhanced ROM chip! It gives the older IIC the
following: (A) checkerboard self-test, (B) capability to operate the
white-case 3.5" external disk drive, and (C) the word "BUGGIE" greets to
at the top of the opening screen at power-up!
Price, $8.00 plus $2.00 shipping within USA. (3.00 shipping to Canada).
(Shipping amount charged on only the first ROM chip; others shipped at
same time no extra cost for shipping.). Installation instructions sheet
included.) GUARANTEED TO WORK IN IIC: each one will be pre-tested prior
to shipping. Long live the IIC!
Stephen Buggie (Ph.D., U.of Oregon) | (505) 863-7504 |
Psychology Professor | fax: (505) 863-7717 |
Univ. of New Mexico, Gallup | home:(505) 863-2390 |
200 College Rd. | buggie@unm.edu |
Gallup, NM 87301 | |
**=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=**
** Teaching: general psychology, experimental psychology, **
** brain & behavior, cognitive psychology, perception, **
** statistics, learning/memory, cross-cultural psychology **
**=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=**
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Wayne Stewart wrote:
> David Wilson wrote:
>
> > Wayne, you are out by a factor of two. The original IIc ROM is a 23128 (16KB)
> > while the later versions use a 23256 (32KB).
>
> That makes sense. Somehow I'd had the idea that the orinal ROM was an
> 8k without actually thinking about it. Now that I do I can see that
> it'd have to be at least a 16k ROM otherwise the code couldn't possibly
> fit. Thanks for pointing that out, it might remind me to look at things
> more closely
>
> Wayne
>
>