Re: Seagate ST255N [20 Meg SCSI] Wanted

[sca <no@spam.com>]

In article <AX8pc.27002$bS1.1769@okepread02>, 
salfter@salfter.diespammersdie.dyndns.org says...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> In article <40A510D7.B32DD194@execpc.com>,
> Robert J. Stevens <atreborz@execpc.com> wrote:
> >OOOPS; Sticky Fingers; is a 225N. I have a 170 Meg Apple drive but would be
> >too large for My Apples
> 
> Huh?  If by "too large" you only mean "I'll never use all of it," you could
> be right, but that 170MB drive will work just fine in a II.  (Hell, my IIGS
> is currently running off a 4.3GB 7200rpm drive...it was cheap enough and
> only need an 80-to-50-pin converter to hook it up.  It's probably big enough
> to hold every Apple II program ever written. :-) )

Hmm....

Thinking about that.  What is it that PREVENTS us from using larger 
volumes?  Why can't we hack GS/OS or ProDOS to use more of the hard 
drives? Why is it practically impossible?

Charles