[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zip Chip Vs TransWarp //e
- Subject: Re: Zip Chip Vs TransWarp //e
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:01:26 -0600
- In-reply-to: <i_K7c.32527$1r6.15248@fe2.texas.rr.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
- References: <i_K7c.32527$1r6.15248@fe2.texas.rr.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4601
Bryan Parkoff wrote:
Do you know which is better Zip Chip or Transwarp //e card for Apple II+
and //e? Transwarp //e has more features.
Zip chip doesn't take up a slot.
Which means for an older //c, or a Franklin 2000/500 series machine,
it's the better choice.
Roy
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----