[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it
In article <20030824021636.10744.00000383@mb-m14.aol.com>,
supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer) wrote:
> Greg Buchner <apple22@mn.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer) wrote:
> >
> >> I would argue that Apple is the Microsoft of the Mac
> >> world. Look what they did to their "partners" during
> >> the Mac clone fiasco.
> >
> >Yea, but also take a look at what the Mac cloners were doing to Apple.
> >The clone companies got Apple to agree on cloning based on the fact that
> >they would work towards expanding the Mac market. They didn't do that,
> >they just went after the market Apple already had. Splitting up an
> >already small percentage amongst more companies just didn't work.
>
> It is called competition and it would have made
> the Mac a more viable alternative to the PC by
> infusing competition based innovation into a
> stagnant platform.
But Apple couldn't compete against both the cloners and the dominance of
the Wintel world. As for innovation, I think Apple innovates more than
just about everyone else these days. It's taken them a while.
I think that the only way the Mac clones could have really succeeded was
if the company that was trying to 'clean room' the Mac ROMs/OS had done
it...following how the PC world did clones.
> Want to see what good clones can do? Look
> at Palm.
It's easier to do with a device that people are more likely to pick up
on a whim. And the world is a many varied place...you can't take what
one companies done and say it should apply to another. Reality doesn't
work that way.
Greg B.
--
There's just one 2 in my e-mail address, so delete one to e-mail me.