Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it

[Greg Buchner <apple22@mn.rr.com>]

In article <20030817180046.10944.00000225@mb-m14.aol.com>,
 supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer) wrote:

> One thing I find really funny about Apple these days is
> how they try to deny AMD out of existence.  In 2000,
> when the Athlon K7 was introduced, it was the same
> thing.  All you heard from Apple was G3 vs. PIII even
> though the highest performing PC processor at the
> time was an AMD part.

I don't find it funny...the people who do the comparisions are always 
using the multi-gigahertz Pentium processors when they try to put down 
Apple.

The people I know (in person) who use AMD usually don't care about Apple 
and who's faster or has the higher hertz rating.

Most of the people I know (again, in person) who are into the Intel 
world are always pushing the hertz...

So, why should Apple bother with AMD, AMD isn't a problem for Apple.

Greg B.

-- 
There's just one 2 in my e-mail address, so delete one to e-mail me.