[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which Apple II?

Subject: Re: Which Apple II?
From: "Mark Cummings" <NOTfigjams@primus.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:58:57 +1000
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: iPrimus Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@iprimus.com.au
References: <1fwytad.lp0glv2hl8d2N%jamiekg@e3.net.nz> <20030622190617249+1200@news.inv.ihug.co.nz> <vfbo406cm4otfb@corp.supernews.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:31851

> A IIc with a UniDisk or a IIc+ is also nice.    An 800K floppy feels like
a
> hard disk compared with the 160K on a 5.25" disk. The compactness and
> elegance of the IIc/IIc+ makes them attractive, lack of slots is a
downside.

hey Paul,

I'm sure you made a typo, but where are you getting the extra 20K on your
5.25s ?

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>

References:
- Which Apple II?
  - From: jamiekg@e3.net.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet)
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: Roger Johnstone <rojaws@es.co.nz>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>

Prev by Date: Re: New kid on the block, second part...
Next by Date: Re: Which Apple II?
Previous by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Next by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread