[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The IBM PC's slavish devotion to the Apple II
In article <1fwgrgl.5go6pvy22uraN%email@luddite.ca>,
Simon Williams <email@luddite.ca> wrote:
>Bill Garber <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Maybe the original poster of that statement will repost,
>> it was something I read on one of the usergroups also.
>> I guess I should've kept quiet. I have a bad habit of speaking
>> out of turn. Sorry.
>Hey Bill, are you thinking of Microsoft rather than IBM? I'm not clear
>on the details, but I believe MS was instrumental in keeping Apple on
>the go during the late 90's. Some cynical folks would suggest that they
>did this because the continued existence of Apple Computer Inc was
>evidence against the Microsoft monopoly.
>[No source available -- just a vague recollection ;-) ]
This could be the alleged "bailout" when ms purchased a staggering
amount of non-voting apple stock. However, apple was not short on cash
at the time, and this was actually a settlement of several suits
outstanding . . .
However, the Wall Street Journal reported in the early 90's that they'd
found a company financed by ms that did nothing by write internet
software for the Mac . . .
hawk, who remembers when ms with ms-dos was the good guy that was going
to save us from ibm domination . . .
h
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of X and postings.
Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \