Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
<snip>
Is a PowerPC Mac running MacOS 7.x still a Mac? I think so.
Is an OS X Mac still a Mac. Perhaps, perhaps not.
Would a IIgs with an Intel/AMD or PowerPC cpu running GS/OS or ProDOS
still a II? I think so.
Is a PowerPC Mac running Bernie a II? It doesn't seem so to me.
To be really nit-picky, the main requirement for an Apple II being an
Apple II is that it came off Apple's assembly-line with an Apple II logo
on the case ;-)
Now if you could add a USB-to-7-Apple-II-expansion-slots adaptor to that
PPC running Bernie, then I guess you could call it an Apple II
*compatible*.
On the other hand, building an expansion card with a G4 or Pentium
processor on it would really be no different than installing a CP/M card
- it's still an Apple II.
also, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
<chop>
I also really appreciate these older systems because they are "frozen
in time", and that makes doing things with them an exercise in finesse,
or "resource-constrained" programming (which I, personally, love).
This same resource-limitation and frozen state (actually I'd rather call
it a "glacial crawl") also make the Apple II a very accessible system
for the novice to tinker with.
<cut>
I should probably say that my own feeling is that the //e was the
culmination of the classic Apple II line, and the IIgs is its Rococo
decline.
I would have thought it more of a post-modern thing... ;-)
-SW