Re: SoundMeister recording quality?

[salfter@salfter.dyndns.org (Scott Alfter)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <bafr1o$t095a$1@ID-194148.news.dfncis.de>,
Rodney Hester <rod72@optonline.net> wrote:
>However, the recording quality is _horrid_.  I'm not talking about mildly
>annoying here, I'm talking about unbelievably noisy and faint to the point
>of being rather difficult to make out what was said at all (if you didn't
>know in advance).
>
>I'm using a standard late-90s PC 'boom microphone' to do the recording, and
>even with sensitivity set to High in DigitalSession, the oscilloscope shows
>no more than maybe 1/4 of the total scope in amplitude when I yell into the
>mic.

I've never had any recording problems with mine...then again, I always used
line-level input to capture audio from tape.  If there's some deficiency in
the SoundMeister's handling of microphone input, I would have never
noticed it.

  _/_   Scott Alfter
 / v \  salfter@salfter.dyndns.org
(IIGS(  http://alfter.us            Top-posting!
 \_^_/  pkill -9 /bin/laden         >What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+y/i3VgTKos01OwkRAnsdAJ98mrpbFmXdSWD7A79CJhl8pEtKkwCg05M4
fUU1ag8JkipNxUzxB1JSe/g=
=ZllT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----