Re: 65802 vs. 65C02?

["Ole Voss" <ole.voss@netrogue.de>]

I always thought the //c was shipped with the 65C02 - the 65802 wasn't ever
used in Apple products afaik.

ole.


"Dosius" <steve@dosius.zzn.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
9307085f.0303190602.18706e95@posting.google.com">news:9307085f.0303190602.18706e95@posting.google.com...
> Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.spamless.net> wrote in message
news:<3E77C346.7010206@telus.spamless.net>...
> > The IIc+ came with a 65C02. You could emulate a 65802 but last I
> > heard there's only two programs in existence which will use the 65802
> > if it's present. A pity Apple didn't adopt it, a lot more programs
> > might have been written to utilize it.
> >
> > Wayne
>
> All the docs I read said that the IIc+ came with the '802... :\ I
> think I saw '802 ops in the ROM, but I'm not sure.  I thought maybe
> that was why I got that freaky crash loop when stuffing the IIc+ ROM
> into the //c emulation.
>
> -uso.