Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari

["Wildstar" <wildstar128@hotmail.com>]

6507 is a 6502 derivitive so it is a 6502 snce the instruction sets the
same. Like the 6510.
Thank You.

"Alan Michelson" <zap@lafn.org> wrote in message
3D87E727.E0648528@lafn.org">news:3D87E727.E0648528@lafn.org...
> Mo wrote:
> >
> > Also I knew that didn't sound right about the 2600 so I looked up the
specs
> > on it-
> >
> > 2600 Specifications:
> >
> > CPU: 6507
> > RAM: 128 Bytes, in VLSI
> > ROM: 6K Max
> > CPU Clock: 1.19 MHz
> > Graphics Clock: 3.58 MHz
> > Slot Config: Rom Access Only
> > CPU Avail: Less than 50%
> >
> >  Atari Lynx :
> > CPU: 6507 RAM: 128 Bytes, in VLSI ROM: 4K max
> > Cpu Clock: 1,19 MHz
> > Graphics Clock: 1,19 MHz Slot
> > Config: Rom access only CPU Avail: less than 50%
> >
> > Very interesting, looks like the lynx is the grandson of the 2600!
> > I know this is off topic, I just wanted to spare you the flaming from
one of
> > them thar commie's.
> > Mo
>
> Now it's right on some new topics!
>
> > "William Kendrick" <bill@newbreedsoftware.com> wrote in message
> > news:w17h9.24222$Ik.569287@typhoon.sonic.net...
> > > In comp.sys.handhelds Alan Michelson <zap@lafn.org> wrote:
> > > > It seems that the Macintosh is similar to the Amiga.
> > >>
> > > In case you were curious, the Atari 2600, Atari 8-bit computers,
> > > Commodore Vic-20, Commodore 64, Commodore 128, Apple II, Nintendo NES
> > > and I believe Atari Lynx all had the same CPU...  The 6502.
> > > (Many other systems had that CPU, too!)
> > >
> > >