Re: Juiced.GS

["Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>]

"Exegete" <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote
(the usual)

I've said my piece, Exegete.  I don't think there's any need for me to say
any more on this topic. I'm going to get back to helping keep the Apple II
platform going.   I'm blocking your posts as of....now.
Bye.
-Paul


n message 3D5597BA.9040404@noneofyourbusiness.com">news:3D5597BA.9040404@noneofyourbusiness.com...
>
>
> Paul Grammens wrote:
>
> > "Bruce Baker" <Bruce.Baker@juge.com> wrote
> >
> >>No I agree with Roy, this is more like a two way street.  You yourself
> >>
> > have
> >
> >>been part of the lane.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I've fought fire with fire, and CSA2 is the better for it.
>
>
> I disagree.
>
> Those who
> > persecuted Tom, Rubywand, et al got a taste of their own medicine from
me.
>
>
> Ah, and what of the persecution of Joe Kohn et al in years/months past?
> Do you care about that? I've never seen you defending their rights.
>
>
> > They don't bother us,
>
>
> Who is "us"?
>
> I won't bother them.  If you go back and take a look,
> > you'll see I didn't start any fights.
>
>
> Ah, but you admit that you have given what you condemn others giving.
> And even if you didn't "start any fights" who says such were started by
> those you abused? I've seen plenty of blame to go around.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>While I agree cursing is a big factor.  I see no reason why intelligent
> >>
> > people
> >
> >>should have to curse to make a point.  But why must people be called
> >>
> > Vogons?
> >
> >
> > People who get called Vogons usually called someone else something a lot
> > worse first.
>
>
> Perhaps. But not always. And in a number of cases not at all. Now, how
> do you defend name calling when the person called a name hadn't done
> such themselves?
>
>
> >
> >
> >>Ridicule is a very powerful weapon.
> >>
> >
> > Agreed.  I used it defensively, and you'll find a lot more usefull Apple
II
> > info here now and a lot less dreck.
>
>
>
> While that is true, it had nothing to do with your ridicule. It has to
> do with: 1) Tom not posting; 2)QC not posting; 3) Jeff H. not entering
> any disputes; 4) Ditto Rudy.
>
> It seems to me that you are taking credit for an accomplishment that
> wasn't achieved by your ridicule.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>I speak for no one, maybe some
> >>would disagree.  Well, I'm pretty sure that some would disagree.  But we
> >>
> > are
> >
> >>still too small to have two or more angry factions.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > That's long been my point, Bruce.
>
>
> So then, I suggest, rather than defending "your side" that you, and all
> of us here, just ignore the lewd, rude, crude, and socially
> unacceptable, and go one with the joy of promoting the Apple II.
>
> Thumper's father wasn't all wrong, you know.
>
> Roy
>
>
> > -Paul
> >
> >
> >
>