Re: Since Conrad has gone AWOL - Let us speculate about the Transwarp Clone Project!

["Apple2Steward" <none@none.net>]

"Conrad" <conrad.russo@gmail.com> wrote in message 
48b8c2a6-6c6a-4317-842c-4b6e11efbe63@googlegroups.com">news:48b8c2a6-6c6a-4317-842c-4b6e11efbe63@googlegroups.com...

 . . .the process . . .


Conrad - all of the vagueness and obfuscation is what drives 
people to distraction!!

Try answering these questions _in detail_ so people understand 
the situation:


1.  Where are the cards physically located at this moment? 
Vancouver?
2.  Who has physical custody of the cards?
3.  What shipper/carrier did you use?  Who is the "shipping 
agent"?
4.  What legal entity is requiring the "updated paperwork" - 
Canadian Customs, the carrier, your bank, the seller's bank, the 
electronics company, who?
5.  What exactly _is_ the "updated paperwork"?  Give it a name!
6.  What legal impediment or defect in the "paperwork" is 
preventing you from taking possession of the cards - i.e. is it a 
problem with payment, customs, title?
7.  You originally said it was a problem with the spelling of 
your name - how was your name misspelled?
8.  How are you communicating with all of these stakeholders to 
resolve the "process" - telephone mail, email, telegram, fax? 
Why do any of these methods take so long?
9.  You say you are "leaning on both the electronics company and 
the shipping agent."  What does that mean?  What do each of these 
parties need to provide in order to complete the transaction?
11.  Have you inspected the shipment of cards?  If so, where are 
the pictures you promised?


Early on, you wrote a detailed post on the use of the bill of 
lading in international trade.  Now, the best you have done is to 
make allusions to the "process."  It is this lack of specificity 
in your explanations that lends an aura of bullshit to all of 
your recent representations.