[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?

Subject: Re: Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?
From: Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:37:15 -0500
Cancel-lock: sha1:h9vfnk2Mz+HPqQ8+X53B6jrL5Go=
In-reply-to: <415e8325-ea2e-4e3c-b6fb-129185aa676f@googlegroups.com>
Injection-info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b1331f5cb4326106a7720f5a86b16b36"; logging-data="28608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PwEc1NWl9OOsnlxdKeQe93rcS7TAqFso="
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: <1c156ee2-f1d8-4418-a7a9-0c047c607e65@googlegroups.com> <415e8325-ea2e-4e3c-b6fb-129185aa676f@googlegroups.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, mspangler@gemsi.com wrote:

Besides the beagle compiler, I think beagle's Extra K and Big U diskshad some routines that helped Applesoft use the extra RAM, at leastunder Prodos. Or at least they would help with the first 128K. Somewhere there was a quicksort routine that used the aux bank.


EXTRA.VARIABLES, which has both DOS 3.3 and ProDOS versions.

-uso.

References:
- Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?
  - From: pacati@yahoo.com
- Re: Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?
  - From: mspangler@gemsi.com

Prev by Date: Re: Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?
Next by Date: Re: Macintosh Apple IIe Card - How Good Is The Compatibility?
Previous by thread: Re: Extended RAM in //e: will applesoft utilize?
Next by thread: The Apple II Documentation Project changes head!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread