[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Virtual serial drive
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 7:02:30 PM UTC-7, schmidtd wrote:
> On 9/14/2012 2:21 PM, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
>
> > David Schmidt <schmidtd@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >> On 9/14/2012 1:35 PM, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
>
> >>> David Schmidt <schmidtd@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 9/13/2012 6:19 PM, Sean Fahey wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael J. Mahon wrote:
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>>> Be careful--the next logical step is having your IIc just be a terminal for
>
> >>>>>> an emulator running on the PC. And the serial link is too slow for
>
> >>>>>> graphics!
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>> I do like the idea of getting the time/date with each vdisk access...
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>> Well... let's toy with this idea. Why not a small form factor machine,
>
> >>>>> like a Raspberry Pi or similar mini 'PC' that could provide HD
>
> >>>>> partitions (and/or disk serving), clock functions (at least date and
>
> >>>>> time stamping) and serial to ethernet connectivity at the same time?
>
> >>>>> That's the kind of love the //c (and IIc+) could benefit from.
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>> Until the SPVHD is shipping again (it's supposed to be getting a clock
>
> >>>>> driver too), a serial solution may be the only viable option for a long time.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> Is there a protocol for transporting the date/time somewhere I can look
>
> >>>> at? Is there maybe a status request I can implement or something?
>
> >>>
>
> >>> I'd suggest putting it into every vdisk protocol packet from the host in
>
> >>> 4-byte ProDOS format. Then the client could just copy it to the ProDOS
>
> >>> global page.
>
> >>
>
> >> That's straightforward. Does it have to be every disk access - or could
>
> >> it happen at initialization time and be done?
>
> >
>
> > Ideally every block read. Then the time-date stamps would all be accurate
>
> > to the second, and any program wanting the info could just pick it up from
>
> > the global page.
>
> >
>
> > I suppose the frequency of transferring the date bytes could be reduced,
>
> > but it's only two bytes--and then there's the conditional code to deal with
>
> > midnight,,, Better to keep it trivial. ;-)
>
>
>
> Ok, I implemented a protocol change that sets the date/timestamp on
>
> every block read. Works quite nicely, as you suggested. I'm not going
>
> to re-benchmark, because I again don't want to know. :-) there's some
>
> more code going on - more checksum computation, more conditionals (only
>
> update time when checksums match), so it'll be a little slower. But
>
> it's a pretty neat feature to have. Good job, all!
>
>
>
> Oh, and I fixed the processor status bit pollution I was getting on the
>
> Uthernet side. Your medical and financial records are once again as
>
> safe on UDP as they are on Serial. Which is to say not very. ;-)
>
>
>
> You'll get these updates on the next release, which may be next year, or
>
> may be next weekend. Let's see what else you come up with.
Since you're on a roll, here, I'd like to add some feature requests:
Get kid ready for school in the morning & take dogs out for their "business". This would make ADTPro the true jack-of-all-trades in my opinion. In fact, you could probably charge for such additions. Can you get these in the next version? Thanks!
Dave...