Re: Woz calls for a more open apple

[HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com (Helpful Harry)]

In article <eb6d44c4-8456-484d-aaba-abef0b373f3e@googlegroups.com>, BLuRry
<brendan.robert@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:21:01 AM UTC-5, Helpful Harry wrote:
> > In article <jq4ci6$v63$1@motofox-rules.dont-email.me>, MotoFox
> > <confucius-say@enlightenment!to!him!lead!it!for!bangpath!follow!man!wise.=
> UUCP> wrote:
> > > 
> > > And it came to pass that Helpful Harry delivered the following message
> > > unto the people, saying~
> > >
> > > > Oh lookie, more utter crap from an anti-Apple nutter. What a
> > > > non-surprse.  :o\
> > >
> > > Oh lookie, more utter crap from someone who apparently thinks it's 
> > > mature to call someone who tries to pound a little bit of hard
> > > reality into them names. Really mature.
> >
> > Another moron added to the ignore list.  :o\
> 
> Yay!  My thread got turned into a flame war!  Now I can party like it's 199=
> 2!
> 
> Seriously?  Calling for an open-apple is not an anti-apple statement.  It's=
>  a call for Apple to return to its roots.  And Woz replied to a query of mi=
> ne in the same effect that he agreed with the semtiment, just didn't see ho=
> w it would ever be possible given their current direction.  I'm assuming yo=
> u would claim Woz is an anti-Apple nutter as well?  :-)

Ummm ... you missed a few posts in the topic. Nobody ever said the
original subject was anti-Apple.

Helpful Harry  :o)