[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC or Mac?
- Subject: Re: PC or Mac?
- From: pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)
- Date: 31 Jan 2002 19:49:35 +0100
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Svensk Amat|rAstronomisk F|rening (SAAF)
- References: <a21gmd$lr9$1@naxos.belnet.be> <a39vlq$kpp$1@merope.saaf.se> <u5inccansk8m64@corp.supernews.com> <slrna5j5cd.21.byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:17083
In article <slrna5j5cd.21.byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net>,
Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill <byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net> wrote:
>In article <u5inccansk8m64@corp.supernews.com>, Matthew Russotto wrote:
>> A Mac user has the same choices and has for years. It would be silly
>> to buy a new Mac to run Linux or a BSD variant, because a PC which can
>> do the same is available more cheaply, but the option is there.
>
>Are you calling me silly? ;)
>
>I did buy a Macintosh for the express purpose of running Linux,
>partially because my last experience with PC hardware was horrendous
>(after the second year of use I was replacing disfunctional pieces every
>6 to 12 months and upgrading was prohibitivly expensive after the fourth
>year -- so where is the PC advantage there).
Don't you think it's premature to judge a whole line of computers from
just one single specimen?
As a counter-example I can point to my 14-year old PC where nothing
ever has been broken. Yes I've upgraded it from time to time, not because
I had to but because I wanted to. Naturally it won't run the latest
software -- but it _does_ _still_ _work_ just as well as when it was new!
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40, S-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at saaf dot se
WWW: http://hem.passagen.se/pausch/index.html
http://home.tiscali.se/~pausch/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PC or Mac?
- From: "Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill" <byron@b60z27hbb464i.ab.hsia.telus.net>