[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I knew he was dumb, but this dumb?!
I apologize to the group. I had meant this reply to go in email. And I was
replying to Paul, not Jeff.
I do good work, huh.
Tom Zuchowski
"Tom Zuchowski" <tzuchow@attglobal.net> wrote in message
3ba3530d_1@news3.prserv.net">news:3ba3530d_1@news3.prserv.net...
> I wonder how G.W. is supposed to STOP China from building nukes? G.W. is
> wise in not making a ruckus that will make us look stupid and impotent.
> China is the 800-pound gorilla in the world today, as they are not
> constrained by the rule of law.
>
> I suspect that China knows that we have 1,000 times more nukes than they
do.
> And the neat thing about a missile is that it comes with a return address
> attached.
>
> As for G.W.'s intelligence, he got better grades in college than Gore did,
> and he started out knowing a lot more about foreign policy than Clinton
did
> and has better advisors, but for some reason the liberals weren't so
> concerned about Clinton's gaps in this area.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> "Rubywand" <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote in message
> 3B9588F7.633ED0E5@swbell.net">news:3B9588F7.633ED0E5@swbell.net...
> > Paul Grammens writes ...
> > >
> > > By David E. Sanger, New York Times
> > >
> > > WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration, seeking to overcome Chinese
> > > opposition to its missile defense program, intends to tell leaders in
> > > Beijing that it has no objections to the country's plans to build up
its
> > > small fleet of nuclear missiles, according to senior administration
> > > officials.
> > >
> > > ****************************
> > >
> > > So let me get this straight: Bush has no objections
> > > to the Chinese building more nuclear missiles
> > > pointed at us? Where the hell was Dick Cheney? Isn't
> > > he supposed to be watching George and explaining this stuff to him?
> > ....
> >
> > Tsk!
> >
> > If you know you've got someone and you would just as soon that they
> know
> > that you know, then, GW's reply is the standard response.
> >
> >
> > R/
>
>