[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If you could design a $300 homecomputer today, what would you choose?



In article <72gult4oelnh5vrncej03mu84ofi40okrg@4ax.com>, bobr1
@provide.net says...
> On 25 Jul 2001 20:10:50 +0100, "Chris Young"
> <unsatisfactory@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:17:50 -0400, Bob Retelle (of comp.sys.sinclair "fame")
> >wibbled on for an age:
> >
> >> With the kind of momentum behind the current OS, it's unlikely that
> >> any other OS will be able to overtake the existing software base for a
> >> long, long time, if ever.
> >
> >My point was that the existing software base will not look as good in
> >a decade, let alone decades.
> 
> Sigh...  the software base for the existing Operating System is the
> point.
> 
> The point is that the Operating System a decade from now will likely
> be the same, or a derivation of the current Operating System, so the
> software base a decade from now will likely be the same software base
> as it is now, with incremental changes, not radical shifts in support
> for "other" Operating Systems.
> 
> 
> >
> >> Go to the local CompUSA and check out how much shelf space is devoted
> >> to native Linux apps.
> >
> >Oh, yes, I'll just pop over the Atlantic in my private jet and have a
> >look.
> >
> >Clue: The USA is not "the world"
> >
> Oh, that's certainly the point of this discussion.
> 
> OK then,  CompUK,  or Future Shop,  or whatever.

<snicker> "CompUK" has a funny ring to it :)

Well see what the justice department says about the future of the 
platform :)

Hopefully they'll take they're head outa theyre arse and leave them 
alone, I want to see how Darwinism treats Microsoft.