[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Animate or fantavision?
- Subject: Re: Animate or fantavision?
- From: "Keith Olson" <spamtrap007 @ yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:38:57 -0700
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
- References: <clairmnt-D67F99.22385722072001@news-server> <3B5C2A66.FE8F5060@home.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11341
Imagine my disappointment when I heard about a new release of
'Fantavision', and discovered that it was only a ^%*$&^%$^ *FIREWORK*
sim. <FRUSTRATED SIGH>
"George Rentovich" <grent@home.com> wrote in message
3B5C2A66.FE8F5060@home.com">news:3B5C2A66.FE8F5060@home.com...
> Hi,
> I believe Animate came first, then Fantivision. I beleive you can
do
> more with Fantavision.
> Cartooners is another with action.
> But for longer home made movies on 5.25s Take One. Have quite a few
few
> of them like Jaws, Manhatan Project, Hacker, a few others that
> have just discovered in the piles of Apple stuff that I bought at
school
> sales.
> Take Care
> George
>
>
> Louis Cornelio wrote:
>
> > Both by Broderbund - which came first? Which was better?
> > Inquiring minds!!!
> >
> > ;-)
>
--
Keith Olson
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| For the memory of the uncompromisingly righteous is a blessing, |
| Proverbs 10:7a |
-----------------------------------------------------------------