[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PC Transporter OS

Subject: Re: PC Transporter OS
From: korpela@ellie.ssl.berkeley.edu (Eric J. Korpela)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Cal Berkeley-- Space Sciences Lab
References: <36cd6118.0107102020.5729bc22@posting.google.com> <JOR27.177$Cu2.15003@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <z1S27.187192$DG1.31576636@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:10968

In article <z1S27.187192$DG1.31576636@news1.rdc1.mi.home.com>,
william strutts <wrstrutts1@home.com> wrote:
>Isn't it an 8086 processor on the card? Windows needs
>at least a 80286 for 3.0 and a 80386 for 3.1.

3.0 in real mode would work on a V20/30 and quite possibly on an 8088.

Eric

-- 
Eric Korpela                        |  An object at rest can never be
korpela@ssl.berkeley.edu            |  stopped.
<a href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/~korpela";>Click for home page.</a>

References:
- PC Transporter OS
  - From: waynes@intergate.ca (Wayne Stewart)
- Re: PC Transporter OS
  - From: "Brendon Woirhaye" <bytre@hotmail.com>
- Re: PC Transporter OS
  - From: "william strutts" <wrstrutts1@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The Apple ][ was cool!
Next by Date: Re: Forked Files
Previous by thread: Re: Berkley Software
Next by thread: Re: PC Transporter OS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread