[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple Integer BASIC firmware card
- Subject: Re: Apple Integer BASIC firmware card
- From: SynABit@kc.invalid (Dennis Doms)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:19:50 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <9h2op4$r7j$1@News.Dal.Ca> <993329396.694534@chakotay.ncc74656.org> <l89ajt4odo97rcicka1e0ru40rpcbl8fa2@4ax.com>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9373
If you're not already using slot 3 (for an accelerator, etc.) the card
will also work there. Even if there is an extended memory slot card
installed.
The switch on the card will control whether the system uses the IIe
motherdboard ROM or the Integer Card ROMs when the system is reset.
Note that the card may include either the old non-Autostart ROM
(resets to monitor) or the Autostart ROM (resets to BASIC version on
the card). Neither of these will include some of the extended features
of the IIe ROMs (which call routines outside the 2K address space of
the original Apple II monitor ROMs).
In article <l89ajt4odo97rcicka1e0ru40rpcbl8fa2@4ax.com>, agentwd40
<adrift@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>The integer rom card does work in a IIe. You will loose what ever ram
>the inhibit signal turns off, but few if any integer basic programs
>use more than 48k of ram anyway. There is a small patch that you apply
>to your boot disk so dos will look for integer in slot x instead of
>slot 0. or you can use two pokes to reasign the int location.
>
>Also, the rom card will co-exist with a 16k ram card in a II+.
>My II+ is setup with a 16k ram card in slot 0 and a rom card in
>slot 2.
>I don't know what effect the language card would have in this setup.
>Also, you can use the 16k ram card and rom card in any slot you want.
>The May 1982 issue of Call --A.P.P.L.E. has the int rom patch.
>or I can post it if anyone needs the patch.
>
>Kevin
>
>
>On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:39:02 -0000,
>salfter@salfter.ncc74656.dyndns.org (Scott Alfter) wrote:
>
>
>>AFAIK, no. It would interfere with the upper 16K of RAM, assuming it would
>>work at all. The only machine in which it would work is a II+, and you'd
>>have to yank out any language card you might have to do that (cutting RAM
>>down from 64K to 48K). It would also work in a II, but since that machine
>>has Integer BASIC in it, it would be redundant. (If you can get Applesoft
>>ROMs, you could put those on the card and use it in a II...but if you have
>>Applesoft ROMs, you'd probably be better off yanking the Integer BASIC ROMs
>>off the motherboard and putting Applesoft ROMs in their place.)
>>
>> _/_
>> / v \
>>(IIGS( Scott Alfter (remove Voyager's hull number for email address)
>> \_^_/ http://salfter.dyndns.org
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
>>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>>
>>iD8DBQE7NQDzVgTKos01OwkRAvsVAJsF4MR1gHfwNFW/oxOaBt08CKxIMQCfUoId
>>eZZXY7OytArAsD0TZrx/pOE=
>>=f5YS
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Dennis Doms SynABit@kc.invalid
[ObSpamFoil: substitute "rr.com" for "invalid" above to reply via mail.]
"In the end, only kindness matters." - "Hands", Jewel Kilcher