[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MacShrinkit
In article <990063648.3b032c20639b5@public.webmail.cotse.com>,
penman@cotse.com wrote:
> Hehehe, I forgot about that, QC--thanks!
>
> For those of you who don't know the refernce, Shrinkit is based on
> an alogrythm named, using the intials of it's developers, LZH.
> Unisys now owns the copyrights to that alogrythm, and now charges
> big bucks for it's use. We can still distribute current versions
> of Shrinkit and Shrink II (as well as the AppleWorks based utilities
> developed by Doug Gum which are now freeare) since they were
> developed PRIOR to Unisys deciding to enforce their rights. Any
> attempt to come up with a new product now, without their
> permission - and they've stated publically they want their
> royalities - would be in direct violation of their express
> wishes. Even Ruby should be able to apply his own logic to
> THIS one. So--if you all want a version of Shrinkit that'll run
> on a Mac, you're going to have to go over to Sheppy's and get
> it. :)
>
> Penman
I normally just lurk here, but as someone who's also been looking for a
Mac version of ShrinkIt, I'm curious: does this mean that if, for
example, Shrink II doesn't run under Mac OS X, it couldn't be revised or
updated? I imagine that feature upgrades would result in a "new"
program for which Unisys would want royalties, but would bug fixes
and/or compatibility updates qualify as such as well?
-- David