[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PC Transporter fun

Subject: Re: PC Transporter fun
From: "Christopher D. Heer" <chris-heer.nospam@home.com.nospam>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 21:00:57 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
References: <tf7bb5a5rvrv8f@corp.supernews.com> <3af42150@news.svn.net> <3AF4516B.16210FD8@hotmail.com> <9d34hg$n8i$1@merope.saaf.se>
Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7885

Paul Schlyter <pausch@saaf.se> wrote in message
news:9d34hg$n8i$1@merope.saaf.se...

> I think he's right.  Only Windows up to ver 2 would run on a plain
> 8086/8088.  Windows 3.x did require a minimum of a 286 in standard
> mode.

But Windows 3.0 had Real mode, which worked on a lowly 8088/8086.

--chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PC Transporter fun
  - From: me2@nowhere.org (Bart)

References:
- PC Transporter fun
  - From: me2@nowhere.org (Bart)
- Re: PC Transporter fun
  - From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>
- Re: PC Transporter fun
  - From: "J.Q.P." <jqp@hotmail.com>
- Re: PC Transporter fun
  - From: pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)

Prev by Date: Re: PC Transporter fun
Next by Date: Re: PC Transporter fun
Previous by thread: Re: PC Transporter fun
Next by thread: Re: PC Transporter fun
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread