[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why the RamWorks III?

Subject: Re: Why the RamWorks III?
From: Jim Pendarvis <jpendarv@patriot.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 14:02:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <3aec174c_1@news3.prserv.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
References: <3AEB8B47.2D7E3415@intergate.bc.ca> <3aec174c_1@news3.prserv.net>
Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.sys.apple2:7570

On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Tom Zuchowski wrote:

> I don't actually know much about the RamWorks II, but I believe that it had
> a maximum RAM size of 1MB? The RamWorks III was expandable to 3MB of total
> RAM.
>
> If the II was also able to accept the 2MB expander card, then you may safely
> assume that I have no idea what I am talking about. <g>
>
> Tom Zuchowski
>

The RamWorks II would indeed accept a 2Mb expander. Or you could use the
512k expander. In addition, you could also piggyback an RGB color graphics
card.

jim pendarvis

References:
- Why the RamWorks III?
  - From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@intergate.bc.ca>
- Re: Why the RamWorks III?
  - From: "Tom Zuchowski" <tzuchow@attglobal.net>

Prev by Date: Apple //c manuals?
Next by Date: Can somone help identify these IIGS cards?
Previous by thread: Re: Why the RamWorks III?
Next by thread: Re: Why the RamWorks III?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread