Re: Godel Goofed? Nope.

[olcott <olcott@qwest.net>]

LumiTech wrote:

> in article 3A8D555B.3D2E5723@qwest.net, olcott at olcott@qwest.net wrote on
> 2/16/01 08:29:
>
> > I get that the tactics of avoiding a direct
> > question are often used by people lacking
> > the capability to answer this question, and
> > the avoidance is used to hide this fact...
> > Everything besides a direct answer to this
> > direct question is malarkey...
>
> Olcott,
>
> Look, you mis-interpreted my response. It was NOT directed at you, nor did
> it have anything to do with you. I'll quote it again...
>

Okay, your response taken within the context of QC's
responses, and Roy Miller's responses did seem to be
directed at me... If it was not, then I retract my statements
towards you...

>
> > >>>>> We haven't had as good a village idiot around here since Dorktor
> > >>>>> Tom left forever back in October.  And December.  And January.  ;)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ROFL!
>
> I was NOT "ROFL" to the village idiot part, although now I'm beginning to
> think it fits. As to answering your question in response to your
> mis-interpretation of my post; even if I were able to answer the question, I
> wouldn't care to involve myself beyond listening, as this is not my area of
> expertise. I never claimed it was.
>
> Now go back to what you do best. I will no longer respond to this reference.
> If I should see something in this discussion again that causes me to "LOL"
> again, I'll try and explain it in depth to you. If you don't get it, too
> bad.