Re: Godel Goofed? Nope.

[olcott <olcott@qwest.net>]

Quantum_Cat wrote:

> Hiya, Cooter.
>
>  *>Of course you know that I am referring to your admission to making that
>  *>statement below...
>
> Well, you answered my original long post with that one-liner.  If you were going
> to run away, I figured I'd have some fun with it.  Boy, you don't have much of a
> sense of humour, do you?  ;)
>
>  *>It seems like all that you say is lying in one form or another...
>
> You've certainly been having a grand time yanking your wanker over the matter.
> ;)
>
>  *> *>You forget.  You don't like recursive specifications.  :D That
>  *>invalidates
>  *> *>everything!
>
> Oh... Speaking of lying, Cooter.   1/0 = infinity is a LIE!  ;)
>

You learn by rote, conventional wisdom defines
1/0 as being undefined. I reject learning by rote.
I reject that 1/0 is undefined. I learn by comprehension.
Since the number gets increasingly larger as the denominator
gets smallest, therefore the number must be largest
when the denominator becomes smallest.


>
> Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!
>
> Quantum_Cat