Re: Source Code for OS?

["Simon Biber" <simon@basilisk2.cjb.net>]

> > An interrogative is not an indicative. Therefore, it does not make a
claim, and therefore,
> > it's claim cannot be tested as to whether or not it is false.  You
really need to learn a
> > bit more about grammar. Only an indicative makes an unqualified claim of
truth. To compare
> > an indicative to an interrogative is to compare apples and oranges. You
are ducking the
> > question - again.
>
> No, merely providing a more clear example of
> where an why the liar paradox errs... Here is
> another one...

The example is not clear to me. I would tend to agree with Roy at this
point. Please explain how this demonstrates some error in the liar paradox.

> This sentence is a lie.
>
> What the above sentence true or false, and why?

In as much as I understand what is usually meant by such a statement, it is
impossible to tell true or false. Either way results in an infinite logical
recursion. I am interested for you to explain more fully what point you are
trying to make.

Simon.