[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Source Code for OS?

Subject: Re: Source Code for OS?
From: russotto@wanda.pond.com (Matthew Russotto)
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:41:04 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: DiS(L)organized
References: <3A7F95A6.50E47965@qwest.net> <3A82C8CF.1DAD0317@qwest.net> <JrCg6.5766$fk2.261487@e3500-chi1.usenetserver.com> <3A82FA45.CFDA8095@qwest.net>
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5861

In article <3A82FA45.CFDA8095@qwest.net>, olcott  <olcott@qwest.net> wrote:
>This what he claimed, yet, he erred in this claim.

Quite a few mathemeticians have been unable to find any flaw.

>Kurt's "Incompleteness Theorem" suffers
>from the same error of reasoning as the Liar
>Paradox...

The liar paradox suffers from being in a system (natural language)
which isn't well defined, let alone consistent.  The systems Goedel
dealt with do not have this problem. 

-- 
Matthew T. Russotto                                russotto@pond.com
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Source Code for OS?
  - From: olcott <olcott@qwest.net>

References:
- Re: Source Code for OS?
  - From: olcott <olcott@qwest.net>
- Re: Source Code for OS?
  - From: olcott <olcott@qwest.net>
- Re: Source Code for OS?
  - From: russotto@wanda.pond.com (Matthew Russotto)
- Re: Source Code for OS?
  - From: olcott <olcott@qwest.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Source Code for OS?
Next by Date: Re: Source Code for OS?
Previous by thread: Re: Source Code for OS?
Next by thread: Re: Source Code for OS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread