[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Source Code for OS?



olcott wrote:

> Roy and/or Janet Miller wrote:
>
> > Quantum_Cat wrote:
> >
> > > Hiya, Cooter.
> > >
> > > I'll take Roy's advice and try to trim this post.
> >
> > Thanks for trying.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >
> > >  *>The broadest field that I have ever applied this to is the derivation of a
> > >  *>computer language compiler that produces mathematically optimal
> > >  *>translations.
> >
> > I'm surprised QC that you didn't do what I'm going to do: Ok braggart - what's the
> > name of this superior compiler?
> >
>
> 2point5GL its a cross between "C" and assember.
>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >
> > >  *>Given an infinite amount of time, no one could ever produce a compiler that
> > >  *>would be the slightest trace better than the translations that my compiler
> > >  *>produced.
> >
> > QC, you let me down again. olcott, it took me almost 15 minutes to stop laughing
> > after reading this. So then superboy, let's hear what this infallible compiler is
> > called, who markets it, and what platforms is it available on? Wow, I'm so impressed
> > to be arguing with the greatest programmer in the world, one that no one can best,
> > one who has produced infallible systems. You must work for Microsoft, right?
> >
>
> Ah so rudeness is a part of your spiritual walk?
> The one whom is so arrogant as to call himself
> a professional theologian, while Christ himself
> was an amateur

1. Christ wasn't an amateur
2. I'm not the one who claimed to have written a compiler that the greatest living
programmers, with an infinite amount of time couldn't surpass
3. You still haven't answered the question - who publishes it, what platforms does it work
on, and, by the way, what journals have reviewed this wondersoft, and validated your
incredible claims.
4. My statements are rude - if you are telling the truth. If you are just a gas bag, as
you posts suggest, then all that has happened is you've been shown, once again, and not
just by me, to be wearing no imperial robes.

Roy