Re: Source Code for OS?

[Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>]

olcott wrote:

> There was hatefulness demonstrated in this thread.
> I am under an obligation to God, to correct this
> error when, and where it occurs. My duty to God
> is much higher than my duty to Netiquette.

Ok, obviously you must have the last word on the subject. It is also obvious that you don't
understand that good manners is a matter of obedience to God. So this ends my responses on
this subject.

Roy

>
>
> Roy and/or Janet Miller wrote:
>
> > olcott wrote:
> >
> > > There is only one frame of reference that
> > > utltimately counts, and that is the creators...
> >
> > A tautology. The problem is, I believe that my conceptual frame is as close to the
> > Creator's as I can currently get it, given my limited abilities and the effects of sin
> > in my being. However, I'm smart enough to know that others, with whom I may have
> > profound differences, have the same belief. Given that A can't be Non A, we both can't
> > be right. How to demonstrate to others that their conceptional framework is not true
> > to the world as it is, is the problem. Using the sword, as Islam has done, or torture
> > and brainwashing as Marxism has done, isn't an option for a Christian, not to say that
> > some calling themselves Christians haven't tried it. And I've never found an arrogant
> > attitude to be helpful in that endeavor.
> >
> > However, this conversation with you and Paul is *WAY* off thread, and I would suggest
> > to both of you that if you wish to converse, or debate with me, let's do it by email,
> > rather than by posting to an Apple II newsgroup.
> >
> > Roy