[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building An Apple ][ Software Archive



In article <stfprld8qsmv1b@corp.supernews.com>,
Arkain <rwking@usa.nospam.net> wrote:
 
> "Paul Guertin" <pg@sff.net> wrote in message
> 7gaets027tj23q8966ruiblm140cbtm13g@news.newsguy.com">news:7gaets027tj23q8966ruiblm140cbtm13g@news.newsguy.com...
> 
>> Unlike the word "freeware", the terms "copyright" and "public domain"
>> have a precise legal meaning. Don't use them loosely.
> 
> I've kept the meaning of the terms in tact... mostly. If you consider the
> "copyleft" something that's not a copyright (as the FSF does) then GPL works
> are indeed PD since they don't have a copyright in that sense.
 
But even if you don't think copyleft is a copyright, a copyleft still
imposes restrictions on how the work may be used.  Therefore it's not PD,
since PD means no restrictions whatsoever.
 
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter,  Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40,  S-114 38 Stockholm,  SWEDEN
e-mail:  pausch at saaf dot se   or    paul.schlyter at ausys dot se
WWW:     http://hotel04.ausys.se/pausch    http://welcome.to/pausch