[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q: ADTv.091 for IIGS --> correct operation?
- Subject: Re: Q: ADTv.091 for IIGS --> correct operation?
- From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Date: 2000/09/21
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: SBC Internet Services
- References: <A6my5.5152$mq2.83408@news1.online.no>
Deacon Blue writes ...
>
> Hi!
>
> I have setup the ADT v. 091 on a IIGS (ROM01) using a null-modem connection
> to the built-in Mini-DIN8 connector. 'ADT.EXE' is running as a DOS-job
> under Win ME.
>
> I've experience from before with ADT v.122 running on a IIC-system <--->
> Windows-DOS mode, where the transfers functions flawlessly at 9600 bps.
> speed rate.
>
> My question is related to the performance of the "GS-port" of the software.
> As with v. 122 I got a "OK" confirmation in the MS-DOS dialog and a progress
> bar during the writing process.
>
> This is not the case with GS-version. No information is received to confirm
> write on the DOS-side. When trying to make a directory listing of available
> images, this takes effect only after the second/third attempt.
>
> Aside from this quirky behaviour the programme is able to read/transfer
> DSK-images onto the IIGS-floppy.
>
> Even though the programme works I'm not sure if the source-transfer through
> 'Win Hyperterminal' was successfull at 300 bps, as there appeared some
> garbage text after the save-process had finished. Should this be expected?
>
> ---> Is there available a finished DSK-image containing the latest ADT for
> GS, as with the other v.1.22? I might try this solution to get a 100%
> correct version, if available.
>
....
Almost certainly, your difficulties are on the PC side and stem from
running adt.exe as a DOS job under Win ME instead of under plain DOS. (ADT does
not run well in a Win 95 DOS window, either.) Try restarting your computer in
DOS and running ADT that way.
For a way to check your version of ADT-GS, see the info below ...