Re: ethernet card discussion

["**** ****" <***@***.com>]

Penman wrote in message <200008150135.VAA32222@anon.cotse.com>...
>No one is stating that
>what you're proposingg is bad, John, it's just been
>the attacks, inconsistancies, etc.  Lighten up.
>Penman (making post #2 on this subject.  :) )


Let's make a distinction here. You may not be saying it's bad. Others might
not be saying it's bad. A few are, doing just that. Why? I dunno.

Attacks?
Hector H. Eckler wrote in message ...
>Err, I believe that I did (to end it, see * above) ***note: He is referring
to the fact that he started the bashing***
>but I wouldn't call it bashing, more like squelching vaypoorwhere?
>propaganda.  ***note: this is from another thread, and possibly out of
context***