[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 65032: Re-designed 65c832
- Subject: Re: 65032: Re-designed 65c832
- From: Matt Jenkins <mdj@bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: 2000/08/10
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: RMIT University Computer Science
- References: <399175f3$1@hal.grnco.net>
- User-agent: tin/1.4.3-20000502 ("Marian") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.6 (sun4u))
- Xpident: mdj
Arkain <rwking@no.usa.spam.net> wrote:
I don't see why not, as long as you don't do anything that would break
compatibility with existing 65816 code (since the processor is intended
to be backward compatible), which might be a problem if you mess with
the bank select register.
The original 65832 was intended to be pin compatible with the 65816, so
I'd keep that in mind.
--
Matt(hew) Jenkins. Computer Science (RMIT Bundoora)
email: mdj@cs.rmit.edu.au
-- Site of the Month --
http://www.gnustep.org/