Re: the status of Apple system software & vogon hypocrisy

[Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>]

Frank Townsend writes ...
> 
> But look at this section of the Copyright Act:
> 
> � 117. Limitations on exclusive rights: Computer programs
> (a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of
> Copy.-Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an
> infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or
> authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer
> program provided:
> 
> (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in
> the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and
> that it is used in no other manner[.]
> 
> I would have to say that a reasonable interpretation of this section
> provides at least some legal authority for an owner to use a ROM in the
> manner described by Jeff.
 ....

     Yes, you would have to say that, if someone held a gun to your head or
you were just determined to avoid the obvious facts of the situation.

     A few programs do require that copies of originals be made and used. For
example, Wizardry V is played on copies of the originals because the 'Play
Disks' are changed as you explore the multi-level maze. (Otherwise, making a
copy is permitted only for purposes of having a backup.)

     Using an Apple IIgs does not _require_ anyone to rip out the ROM code
and transport it to another computer. Were the mere wish to transport IIgs
functionality adequate grounds for moving the ROM code, Apple's copyright
(and every other firmware copyright) would be worthless. 



Rubywand