Re: RS-232 port genders

[schmidtd <schmidtd@my-deja.com>]

On Jun 21, 12:33 pm, datajerk <dataj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 21, 9:47 am, datajerk <dataj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I worked with a lot of RS-232 devices in the mid '80s to the early
> > '90s.  Dumb terminals, modems, printers, Alpha Micros, the Apple II,
> > short-hall modems, data collection devices, many different RS-232
> > multiplexers to add terminals to various UNIX systems, etc...
> > Excluding a few oddballs (e.g. Macs) they all used female DB25
> > connectors except, IIRC, IBM PCs (and later the multiplexers started
> > to use RJ45s).  The PCs used a female DB25 for the parallel port and a
> > male DB25 for the serial port.  I always thought this was a poor
> > decision since repairing broken pins on a cable was cheaper than a
> > device.
>
> > As I dug through my vintage serial devices I found a 1985 HP-IL to
> > RS232C device used to provide a serial port to HP-IL devices such as
> > the HP41 calculator.  It also has a male serial port.  That has left
> > me with the thought that something greater was redefining the
> > convention or was it simply the PC that started the trend to use male
> > RS-232 ports primarily on computers?
>
> > In any case, what got me thinking about this was the installation of a
> > newly acquired SSC card for my IIe.  Given my history I was neither
> > shocked or surprised, but it got me thinking.
>
> > I plan to build my own cable for the SSC with a male DB25 to conform
> > with convention and to distinguish it from the female DB25 port I plan
> > to install for my printer card.  Perhaps that was IBM's thinking as
> > well.
>
> I failed to mention that the SSC came with a female DB25.