Re: me stoopidhead

[apple2pd@ground.ecn.uiowa.edu (ground.ecn AppleII Librarian)]

In article <3959854C.95C35F27@inetnebr.com>,
Roy and/or Janet Miller  <millers@inetnebr.com> wrote:
>
>Steve, csa2 was pretty quiet until late last week when the good Doctor showed up
>and and started blasting away in an ugly fashion. Where are the calls for his
>dismissal? QC had been missing in action during that time until after the
>Doctor's return. So, unless the Doctor and QC went on vacation together, (I
>think that odds of that are faint, don't you?) it would seem that so long as one
>side is civilized, or missing, the other will be also. I enjoyed that last few
>weeks. People were helpful, informative, and disagreements were (mostly) civil.
>That's the kind of csa2 I'd like to see.
>

Sorry, I must have missed those posts.  Assuming you mean Dr. Tom, I have
never noticed that his posts are full of swearing and vulgar language,
totally lacking in any substantive discourse.  He is welcome to post on
csa2 on a civil basis.  I agree, there is no room for anyone 'blasting
away in an ugly fashion'.  Which is why I ask people to not tolerate the
garbage that the QC constantly posts.  If the worst QC can say about
another person is composed entirely of vulgar terms and hate, then I
will assume the 'good Doctor' is indeed a good person.  If QC could ever
learn to communicate, then we might listen.

In the meantime, I hope we have more days of civil behaviour on cas2.



-- 

 --Steve  (apple2pd@ground.ecn.uiowa.edu)