Re: Who is Cturley2 ??

[Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>]

"R.A.Guy" wrote:

> The Reverand

Spell it right.

> of the Church of What's Happenin' Lately spewed...

Sounds like the kind of church you'd attend, *if* you'd ever darken the door of a
church.

>
> >Do you have proof that Jeff has done so, or that QC, whomever he
> >maybe has done so? Hmmm? Proof? No... I didn't think so.
>
> No, I don't but that's the implied threat.

No threat was implied. However, such evidently has happened, and a friendly warning
is a good thing to give. Not that you would care about anyone losing their ISP.

> And by the way, thanks for jumping
> in on this thread that isn't addressed to you O Holy Roller...

Holy Roller is a term that refers to Pentecostals. You targeted the wrong end of
the theological spectrum. Or, in other words, you missed by a mile. As for the
thread being addressed to me, well, it was addressed to anyone on csa2, and I
responded LONG before you did.

> >Oh, Charles, we have a volunteer here for you. R.A. Guy wants to give you
> >http/ftp
> >access. He doesn't care!
>
> Not quite right, o font of holy water.

We don't use "holy water" in the theological tradition that I hold to. Missed
again.

> I do not have an ftp site.

Oh, so you would advise others to do what you aren't willing to do. Sweet.

> Oh, and I
> would like for you to show that I am a pirate.

Never said it. Never implied it. However, you are on record as approving of the
actions of same. Again, support for what you don't have the courage to do yourself.

> Cast that rock you bible
> thumper....

Well now, the one who wished to teach me Christian ethics has already failed three
times in this posting. Why am I not surprised?

>
> >Was it the fun, or the dysfunctional that rotted your brain?
>
> No, actually it was reading your posts that did it.

Ah, but you claimed to put the fun in dysfunctional long before I ever crossed pens
(or keyboards) with you. Yet another witless repartee. (Actually, that's a
contradiction in terms, since a repartee is a witty response, but who besides you
would wish to have a pedantic response?)


> > And speaking of "guts to post
> >under their own name," who are you? R.A. Guy, or LJ Silicon? Which
> >personality
> >posted this little meadow muffin?
>
> Take your pick. I'll answer to either. Unlike furball and Penman, I don't give
> a rat's ass  about keping my identity a secret.

But you still missed the point, of course.


> >Well now, since you don't know who 2 of the 3 are, you can't say that with
> >any
> >certainty.
>
> Sure I do. Q-C and Penman.

I'll repeat, and use one syllable words so you do not misunderstand again. You
don't know who Q-C and Penman are, so you do not  know that they have not done any
thing good for the Apple ][ world. You guessed that, and your guess is what is
known as "bearing false witness." In other words, a failure to uphold the ethics
that Jews and Christians would. Not that you'd, as you so eloquently put it, "give
a rat's ass."


> >Exactly. But you just did. So much for your integrity.
> >
>
> Wrong Rev! As for integrity, yours continues to get knocked down with your
> posts. I know that your no milktoast rev, but your not very Christian either.

What would you know about Christianity, or it's ethics? Less than you know about
Penman's or Q-C's real identities, I don't doubt. BTW, that's a fourth violation,
for those who are counting, if any.

> So Roy, why not just poke your head back up your butt and stay there?

My, what an intelligent, educated and elevated response. About what I would expect
from you.

Roy