[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?

Subject: Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
From: Roy and/or Janet Miller <millers@inetnebr.com>
Date: 2000/04/13
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <db72703@pro-entropy.cbbs.cts.com> <20000411220949.00842.00000970@ng-ce1.aol.com>

Raymond wrote:

>    Not only were they expensive (Hey, wasn't everything those days?) but they
> were hard to find too.  Apple had problems with the early IIgs, and then they
> had production problems, and the //e to IIgs upgrades were slow in coming at
> first.

In addition to that, schools wanted newer technology to look like newer
technology. So most schools stayed with the //e, or got the //gs, or
abandoned the ][ line completely.

Roy Miller

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
  - From: buggie@ben03.unm.edu (stephen e buggie)

References:
- Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
  - From: darsys@pro-entropy.cbbs.cts.com (Eric A. Seiden)
- Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
  - From: quadrajet1@aol.com (Quadrajet1)

Prev by Date: Re: Network that works (sort of)
Next by Date: Concerning the Bank St. Writter II archives
Previous by thread: Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
Next by thread: Re: Apple IIgs in IIe case?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread