[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM

Subject: Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
From: Pim Blokland <nipp@nipp.nl>
Date: 2000/01/13
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.comm, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: NIPP
References: <858kbh$3eg13$1@rn.area.com> <38786545.12BFD051@swbell.net> <3878D9CE.E59824C7@dcnet2000.com> <david.947729858@wraith>
User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)

In article <david.947729858@wraith>, david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson) 
wrote:

> in it for zero. Have you tried months 8..12 yet? That would set the 

The ProDOS month format is from 0 to 11 (0 for January). 12 through 15 
are invalid.
-- 
Groetjes, Pim

Pouf it went

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
  - From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)

References:
- Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
  - From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
  - From: Phoenyx <quazar@dcnet2000.com>
- Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
  - From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)

Prev by Date: Re: AEHD drive
Next by Date: Re: AEHD drive
Previous by thread: Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
Next by thread: Re: Minor cosmetic Y2K bug in ProTERM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread