Re: Deja ][

["Anon" <anonymous@cotse.com>]

This message was posted anonymously:

Tom-this is the exact reason you have the reputation that
you do.  You make a statement that you have someone's ok to
release some software, but then offer no proof.  And when
someone asks to see that proof, you suddenly withdraw the
software, leading us to conclude--again--that there WAS no
release.  Both Willie Yeo and the Lost Classics folk can
offer email with header authentication to prove they got
permission to have software as freeware.  All you have,
especially in this case, is some ambiguous comment that you
refuse to authenticate.  I for one would LOVE to have AW
released as freeware, but I know from email that several
people have tried and failed. (Bev--I was told you were
one of those.  If you weren't, sorry.)  Absence of response
is NOT permission to release, nor is someone's offhand
comment.  Enough software has been reclassified this year
to show that proof can be gotten.  Get it.  :)

Penman