[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mecc titles
Give this URL a try:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9908/20/internet.theft/
The "index.htm" didn't work on my end!
In article <19990924004512.22454.00001586@ng-fr1.aol.com>, Supertimer
<supertimer@aol.com> wrote:
> Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote:
>
> >Penman writes ...
> >>
> >> Most MECC titles for the Apple II are still being sold, and are
> >> copyrighted material (I happen to have a MECC catalog at work)
> >>
> >> That being the case, any that would be on an ftp site would be pirated and
> >> illegal.
> > ....
> >
> > Not necessarily. For example, suppose the site manager had contacted
> > MECC
> >and been told "Off the record, we do not mind if you make the software
> available
> >and will not interfer."
> >
> > In such a case, offering the titles might look like copyright
> infringement
> >to you or I or most other users; but, it would not be anything of the kind.
>
> I'm just going to add one thing:
>
> Prior to 1997, an MIT student got away with putting commercial
> software on his school ftp server because he claimed he did not
> make a profit off it and it was not stealing.
>
> In 1997, President Clinton signed into law a measure that
> plugged the loophole. Now it is a federal crime to make available
> copyrighted software whatever its commercial value and even
> if the offender does not make a profit off doing so. Also, it
> is not merely a case of the copyright holder suing the infringer
> anymore. The Justice Department has the power to push a
> federal case against the offender.
>
> And that's just what happened. For the first time, someone
> has been convicted of just making available commercial
> software on his site:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9908/20/internet.theft/index.htm
>
> Remember, what this law does is give the US government
> the power to enforce the law regardless of what the
> copyright holder says or what the infringer profits from
> making software available. It allows the government to
> enforce the letter of the law regardless. It also tightens
> the definition of piracy.