Re: disk transfer methods?

[supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)]

wbdesnoy@acs2.acs.ucalgary.ca (Byron Desnoyers Winmill) wrote:

>The other advantage of ADT is that it is very fast.  (I do not know about
>ProTerm, since it is priced well beyond my reach, but Kermit is rather
>slow on the Apple II.)

ProTERM 3.1 is faster than ADT.  On a IIGS, you can transfer
at 56k (that's 56,000 baud!) and besides, it has Zmodem for
CRC-32 error checking and resumption of transfer if disturbed.
Also, you can transfer all 120MB of files AT ONCE with group
transfer from a hard drive.  You can't do that with ADT.