[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Misc replies



Tony Ward writes ...
> 
> In article <37A64F43.836503B3@swbell.net>, Rubywand
> <rubywand@swbell.net> wrote:
....

> > Someone who posts a message to such a forum has no business expecting to
> > exclude his/her statements from reports produced by any specific individual.
> 
> Perhaps, but the person would expect to be given credit for his words.
 ....

     All of the material seems to be credited-- Dr. Tom's KF exclusive is loaded
with "From: " headings and signatures.

     Possibly you (or Cindy) is concerned about the quote beginning ...

>>
For the past 10 years, Apple II enthusiasts from around the globe have made an
annual pilgrimage to Kansas City, Missouri, to learn more about their computers,
share their knowledge with others, and rekindle the spirit that has made their
virtual community unique and powerful. 
<<

Agreed, Cindy's name should be attached. However; the quote is followed by a link
to the KF web page on which it is presented-- i.e. credit is given to the KF
organization as the source and the reader is encouraged to visit the page (where
he/she will find Cindy's name).

_______


quantum_cat@my-deja.com "wrote":
> 
 ....

> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


     Thank you for sharing what you know!

_______


Richard Bennett  <richard.b-0408992156070001@stan14.zip.com.au> wrote:
> 
....
> 
> Good, fuck off.


     Hey! You and quanchum need to get together.

(Hope you don't mind having your "work" quoted.)

_______



maxjones@indy.net wrote:
> 
 ....

> Some of my words were included in the compilation, much to my dismay.
 ....

     Well, you did post them on one of the _public_ Apple II forums; so, why the
"dismay"? Did you say something dumb?

     Checked the report again. Your stuff looks like regular chatting about goings
on at the Fest-- nothing especially dumb.
 


> Of course, Charles Turley knew most of the posters whose words were used
> would have denied him permission. Maybe that's why he opted against
> doing the decent and respectful thing.
 ....

     The decent respectable thing to do was to report the events of, supposedly,
"the major Apple II Event" of 1999. If news media reported and quoted only what
the subjects of their reports wished reported and quoted, there would be no news.




> IMO, Turley (and his lapdog Rudywand) knew exactly what they were doing
> when they lifted those posts from Delphi without asking permission and
> compiled them for their own use.

    "Lapdog" appears to carry a pejorative taint!

     I did not lift anything from any of the KF threads or contribute anything at
all to Dr. Tom's fine report. (Actually, did not even read the report until it was
published.)

     Feel free to apologize.



> They knew exactly the type of reaction they would get, and got it.
> That was the plan.
 ....


Plan???

A "plan" (plot, conspiracy, ...) to make your bunch look like puffed-up boorish
anal retentive screw-ups?

LOL! As if!



R/