Re: THE CLOCK by Mountain Computer Inc.

[Jonathan Schattke <wizwom@ripco.com>]

Kenneth Schunk wrote:

> Actually, there is a bit more to Y2K compliance than just the 00 year. One
> issue, which is hardware, is the leap year. 1900 was NOT a leap year, and
> 2000 IS. Some clocks assume that the 00 year is a leap year, which is good,
> and some assume that 00 is not (ala 1900), which is a bad thing as far as
> Y2K goes. (Of course, the 00 leap year means you won't be Y2100 compliant,
> but that's a subject for future lawsuits! )

Ken, If one extra day in february is the worst of your problems, you're
doing fine.

-- 
\  /\  /                                       If you aren't happy,
 VVizVVom - Wandering Kernel of Happiness           it's not my fault.
 ~~~> homepage at http://www.ripco.com/~wizwom <~~~