[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter

Subject: Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
From: Warren Ernst <wernst@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:20:18 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: 17g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.12.181.168; posting-account=Zkce0woAAABD8zN13UpVjtJGmlLd1nb8
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <h5t3k655td0s03h1oni6kee870845k7po1@4ax.com> <34c62797-9a01-4f16-874f-9298057de63a@f36g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:20172

The reason you go with CF is because there are already a lot of CF-
based storage cards in use in IIGS's and //e's, so it allows a user to
swap storage cards between all their machines easily.

I would seriously consider getting a //c because of this development,
but not if I had to use SD cards instead of CF.

-Warr

On Jan 28, 10:08 pm, Osgeld <osg...@cheesefactory.us> wrote:

> A) why CF? its outdated and overly complex for an apple, SD in SPI
> mode would overrun it no issue

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
  - From: Eric Rucker <bhtooefr@gmail.com>
- Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

References:
- Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
  - From: Robert Justice <rjustice@internode.on.net>
- Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
  - From: Osgeld <osgeld@cheesefactory.us>

Prev by Date: Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
Next by Date: Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
Previous by thread: Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
Next by thread: Re: Apple //c smartport compact flash adapter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread