Re: ProSel 8 and 16

[ljsilicon@aol.com (LJSILICON)]

Paul Schultz wrote...

>I don't think she's holding users hostage...I think you misunderstood her
>post.

It's entirely possible. I have been using Prosel ever since I reviewed it for
NIBBLE. It is a great set of programs. As for this rantfest that has started
over its release into the public domain, it's gone to extremes. Glen has
released Prosel into the public domain. As far as I know, no restrictions were
placed on its release or distribution by the author. As I stated before, I
agree that Beverly's name should not have been used in conjunction with the
post on Ground. At this point I woul dstill like the details on the Y2K
compliant version of Prosel. This is starting to stink of the "I'm not going to
release the new version of AppleWorks because someone has a pirated copy
syndrome."

If people want Prosel to use now, by all means download it from wherever it's
available. If you want the Y2K compliant version then wait for the official
announcement and release. Quit crying about VAPORWARE!